Goodman v. Lee
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
78 F.3d 1007, 519 U.S. 861, 117 S.Ct. 166, 136 L.Ed.2d 108 (1996)
- Written by Kyli Cotten, JD
Facts
Shirley Goodman (plaintiff) was a singer-songwriter. Goodman performed in a duo with her childhood friend and later husband, Leonard Lee, under the name Leonard and Shirley. In 1956, the duo wrote the song “Let the Good Times Roll,” which was covered by notable artists and largely a commercial success. On the initial copyright, Leonard Lee was listed as the sole author and owner and consequently received all the royalty payments from 1956 until his death in 1976. After his death, Leonard Lee’s daughters, Audrey and Nikki Lee (defendants), received the royalty payments. In 1984, Audrey and Nikki authorized a renewal to the copyright. Goodman demanded her share of royalties for the song but was rebuked. Thus, in 1985, Goodman filed suit in federal court seeking a declaration that she was the co-owner of “Let the Good Times Roll,” and that she was entitled to half of the royalties received from the song. After a full trial, a jury returned a verdict in favor of Goodman, finding that she was a co-owner of the song and that she did not discover that she was not on the copyright until 1984. The district court then entered a final judgment, awarding Goodman half of the royalties paid after Lee’s 1976 death, plus prejudgment interest. Audrey and Nikki Lee appealed, arguing that Goodman’s claim for an accounting was subject to the Copyright Act’s three-year statute of limitations and thus was barred.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wiener, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.