Goodridge v. Department of Public Health
Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
798 N.E.2d 941 (2003)
Facts
Seven same-sex couples in committed relationships including Hillary and Julie Goodridge (plaintiffs) filed individual lawsuits against the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (Department) (defendant) after being denied marriage licenses. Plaintiffs espoused the desire to marry in order to affirm their commitments publicly and to obtain legal and other benefits. The Department defended its position on the grounds that (1) the principal purpose of marriage is procreation, (2) marriage between heterosexual couples provides the best environment for child rearing, and (3) barring same-sex marriage is needed to conserve state and private resources. The trial court ruled in favor of the Department, and plaintiffs appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, C.J.)
Dissent (Spina, J.)
Dissent (Sosman, J.)
Dissent (Cordy, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 707,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
