Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Goodwin v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
67 F.3d 149 (1995)


Facts

Over a period of 25 years, Lloyd Goodwin (plaintiff), a church pastor, increased his church’s size from 25 members to almost 400 members. Goodwin and his wife (plaintiff) regularly received substantial payments from the church, which often essentially doubled the relatively low amount of Goodwin’s church salary. These substantial payments were financed by the anonymous donations of individual church members and were collected several times a year by church leaders, who were acting in accord with formal procedures they had established. The payments were donated on behalf of the entire church. Individual donors did not take charitable-tax deductions for their donations, and the Goodwins did not report the donations as taxable income. The commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service determined that the payments constituted income to the Goodwins, and issued a deficiency notice for the amount of those payments. Rather than contest the notice, the Goodwins paid taxes on the payments and then filed suit against the federal government (defendant) for a refund. At trial, the Goodwins and the government stipulated that the individual donors had acted voluntarily and saw their donations as gifts rather than as payments to retain Goodwin’s services. The district court nevertheless considered the donations as tied to Goodwin’s services, and ruled that the donations constituted taxable income. The Goodwins appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Loken, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.