Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.
Labor Arbitration
80-2 ARB ¶ 8468 (1980)

- Written by Miller Jozwiak, JD
Facts
Under a labor agreement between Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company (Goodyear) (defendant) and a union (plaintiff), second-shift employees (between 3:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m.) and third-shift employees (between 11:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.) received slight pay increases. Goodyear also had the authority to change daily start times so long as it gave the union sufficient notice. The pay-premium provisions differed from a prior version of the agreement, which gave pay increases for all work performed between 7:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. After Goodyear and the union negotiated these changes, layoffs resulted in the elimination of the second shift at Goodyear. Eventually, to operate more efficiently, Goodyear implemented a split shift by which some employees began work midway through the first shift (e.g., at 11:00 a.m.) and ended work during the second shift (e.g., 7:00 p.m.). But Goodyear failed to pay these split-shift workers pay increases for time worked past 3:00 p.m. The union filed a grievance challenging the failure to compensate the split-shift workers with pay increases for time worked past 3:00 p.m. Goodyear claimed that under the plain language of the agreement, only workers who began working at 3:00 p.m. were entitled to the pay increase. Goodyear also cited its authority to adjust working hours. The union responded that this undermined the rationale of the agreement—for example, it would allow Goodyear to shift the start time to 3:15 p.m. and avoid paying any additional wages.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Knight, Arbitrator)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.