Goosen v. Commissioner

136 T.C. 547 (2011)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Goosen v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
136 T.C. 547 (2011)

SH

Facts

Retief Goosen (plaintiff) was a British citizen and professional golfer who entered into endorsement agreements with Acushnet, TaylorMade, and Izod (sponsors), among others. Goosen agreed to allow the sponsors to use his name and likeness for advertising and promotional materials worldwide and to wear or use their products during tournaments. The sponsors agreed to compensate Goosen with a base endorsement fee, but that fee was prorated if Goosen did not compete in a specified number of tournaments. The sponsors also agreed to offer bonuses to Goosen if he achieved a specific finish in a Professional Gold Association (PGA) or European Tour tournament. Goosen characterized the endorsements fees and bonuses earned from the sponsors as 50 percent personal-services income and 50 percent royalty income on his nonresident federal income tax returns for 2002 and 2003. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) determined that Goosen should have characterized the endorsement fees and bonuses from the sponsors as 100 percent personal-services income. Goosen filed a petition challenging the IRS’s determination.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kroupa, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership