From our private database of 22,600+ case briefs...
Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History
Court of Appeals of New York
492 N.E.2d 774 (1986)
Gordon (plaintiff) slipped on a piece of paper and fell on the steps of the American Museum of Natural History (defendant). The paper came from a concession stand that the Museum contracted to operate on the steps. Gordon testified that he saw other pieces of paper on another portion of the steps prior to his fall. Gordon argued that the Museum either had actual notice or constructive notice of the dangerous condition created by the papers, and that it was negligent in failing to remedy this condition. A jury found for Gordon, and the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division affirmed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Memorandum)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 519,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 519,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.