Gordon v. Drape Creative, Inc.

909 F.3d 257 (2018)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Gordon v. Drape Creative, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
909 F.3d 257 (2018)

  • Written by Philip Glass, JD

Facts

Christopher Gordon (plaintiff) received trademark protection for his famous phrase “Honey Badger Don’t Care” (HBDC) for use in merchandise, including greeting cards. In 2012, Zazzle, Inc., and the Duck Company (Zazzle and Duck) received a license from Gordon for the production of greeting cards with the HBDC mark. That same year, Drape Creative, Inc. (DCI) (defendant) started designing and selling greeting cards using the HBDC mark without Gordon’s permission. Gordon sued DCI for trademark infringement under the Lanham Act. Gordon’s evidence included DCI’s uncreative use of the mark on various cards, which Gordon alleged could confuse purchasers at Gordon’s expense. However, DCI did at times creatively vary the mark and also printed its website’s hyperlink on its cards. The district court granted DCI’s motion for summary judgment. The district court determined that Gordon failed to prove that DCI’s use of the mark in its expressive works expressly misinformed prospective consumers as to the origin of the cards. Gordon appealed the district court’s decision.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bybee, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership