Gorin v. United States
United States Supreme Court
312 U.S. 19 (1941)
- Written by Tanya Munson, JD
Facts
Gorin and Salich (defendants) were tried and convicted by the United States (plaintiff) for obtaining documents connected with the national defense in violation of the Espionage Act. The Espionage Act prohibits obtaining information respecting the national defense or information concerning a variety of places and things, such as vessels, air crafts, signal stations, or other places connected with the national defense, to be used to the injury of the United States or the advantage of any foreign nation. Salich provided Gorin with reports from a Naval Intelligence branch office that detailed information about Japanese military and civil officials and other persons of interest. Gorin was acting as an agent for the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Gorin and Salich appealed, arguing that the Espionage Act’s prohibitions were limited based on the specific language of the act and that the definition of national defense is unconstitutional based on its indefiniteness.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Reed, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.