From our private database of 34,000+ case briefs...
Gotlieb v. Taco Bell Corp.
United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York
871 F. Supp. 147 (1994)
Gotlieb and Blaymore (plaintiffs) entered into a 20-year lease with Taco Bell Corporation (defendant). The lease provided that: (1) rental payments were to begin on June 15, 1992; (2) Taco Bell was required to pay a monthly base rent, along with additional rent for items such as taxes and utilities; (3) Taco Bell was obligated to obtain permits and approvals for restaurant construction and operation, but could cancel the lease if it was unable obtain the permits and approvals by February 15, 1992; and (4) Taco Bell was obligated to pay the plaintiffs liquidated damages for breach of the lease terms. Community groups opposed the restaurant’s construction. On February 10, 1992, Taco Bell sent the plaintiffs a letter requesting alteration of the lease terms. Taco Bell filed a permit application on February 14, 1992, and sent the plaintiffs a letter repudiating the lease on the same date. The plaintiffs responded with a letter denying Taco Bell’s request to alter the lease terms, rejecting the repudiation, and stating that the plaintiffs would hold Taco Bell liable under the lease. In June 1992, the plaintiffs sued Taco Bell for past and future rent, and for acceleration of all future rent due under the lease. Taco Bell refused to pay. During trial, the plaintiffs testified that: (1) on October 19, 1993, the plaintiffs met with Rite-Aid Corporation (Rite-Aid) representatives to discuss renting the premises, and (2) on November 3, 1993, the plaintiffs submitted a proposed lease to Rite-Aid that included higher rental rates than those included in the Taco Bell lease.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Orenstein, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 607,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 607,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 34,000 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.