Gould Estate v. Stoddart Publishing Co.

30 O.R. (3d) 520 (1996)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Gould Estate v. Stoddart Publishing Co.

Ontario Superior Court of Justice
30 O.R. (3d) 520 (1996)

Facts

Glenn Gould was a famous Canadian concert pianist. In 1956, Jock Carroll, a journalist, spent a great deal of time interviewing and photographing Gould for an article. A magazine published the article and some of Carroll’s photographs of Gould. After Gould’s death in 1982, his interests were represented by the Gould Estate (the estate) (plaintiff). In 1995, without the estate’s authorization, Stoddart Publishing Co. (Stoddart) (defendant) published a book that Carroll wrote about Gould, incorporating some of Carroll’s photographs. Gould and Carroll never discussed uses of Carroll’s photographs beyond publication in the magazine in 1956. The estate sued Stoddart, arguing that the unauthorized use of the photographs constituted the tort of invasion of privacy by appropriation of name or likeness, also known as appropriation of personality, wrongful appropriation of personality, and misappropriation of likeness. Stoddart filed a motion for summary judgment in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lederman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership