Goulding v. Cook
Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
422 Mass. 276, 661 N.E.2d 1322 (1996)
- Written by Patrick Busch, JD
Facts
The Cooks (defendants) used a cesspool to dispose of home waste. The cesspool malfunctioned due to a neighbor’s installation of a swimming pool, and the local government required the Cooks to install a septic system. The only suitable site was a 2,998-square foot triangle of land. The Cooks claimed that they owned the land, but their neighbors the Gouldings (plaintiffs) insisted that they were the owners and refused permission to install a septic system. The Gouldings sought a preliminary injunction against the installation, which was denied. The Cooks installed a septic system on the land. Later, the trial court determined that the Gouldings owned the land, but granted the Cooks an easement to continue to operate the septic system, with payments to be made to the Gouldings. The intermediate appellate court affirmed, and the Gouldings appealed to the state supreme court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fried, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
