Government of Peru v. Johnson
United States District Court for the Central District of California
720 F. Supp. 810 (1989)
- Written by Heather Whittemore, JD
Facts
The United States Customs Service seized 89 pre-Columbian artifacts from Benjamin Johnson (defendant). The artifacts appeared to be Peruvian in style. The government of Peru (plaintiff) filed a conversion lawsuit against Johnson in the United States, alleging that it owned the artifacts and seeking their return. Under Peruvian law, Peru owned all unregistered pre-Colombian artifacts found in the country after 1929. However, a change in the law in 1985 left a period between January 5 and June 22, 1985, during which time excavated pre-Colombian artifacts could be owned by a private individual. Further, the extent of Peru’s ownership over pre-Columbian artifacts was unclear, as Peru had never sought to exercise its ownership rights over such property. At trial, a Peruvian archaeologist stated that the artifacts likely came from a particular site in Peru. However, the archaeologist also explained that the Peruvian pre-Columbian culture to which the artifacts were linked included parts of Bolivia and Ecuador. Johnson argued that he had purchased the artifacts in good faith and that Peru had failed to establish its ownership of the artifacts.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gray, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
