Government of the Virgin Islands v. Archibald
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
987 F.2d 180 (3d Cir. 1993)
(1) Alan Archibald (defendant) was charged with three counts of aggravated rape of Latoya Chinnery (Latoya), a minor, by the Government of the Virgin Islands (plaintiff). At trial, the prosecution asked Latoya’s mother, Ursula Williams, how she knew Archibald. Williams responded by saying that Archibald was her neighbor and that he had fathered a child with Williams’ other daughter, Tasha. Williams also testified that the child was six months old at the time of trial and that Tasha was 15, meaning that the child was conceived when Tasha was thirteen or fourteen years old—an act that constituted statutory rape. A sidebar was requested immediately after Williams’ response. Archibald’s counsel objected to the testimony based on Rule 404(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, which says that evidence of other crimes or acts of the defendant is not admissible to prove that the defendant acted in conformity with those acts in the current instance. The district court overruled the objection, but gave the jury a limiting instruction on the testimony. (2) On cross-examination of Williams, Archibald asked if Williams had ever seen Archibald and Latoya alone together or “overheard any conversations with Latoya and [Tasha] concerning Mr. Archibald.” Williams answered no. On redirect examination, Williams testified that Tasha had told Williams that Archibald and Latoya “were kissing while dancing at a party.” Archibald objected to this testimony on hearsay grounds, but the district court ruled that Archibald had “opened the door” by asking Williams these questions. The jury convicted Archibald. He appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Cowen, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.