From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...
Government of the Virgin Islands v. Weatherwax
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
77 F.3d 1425 (1996)
A federal jury convicted William Weatherwax (defendant) of second-degree murder and illegal firearm possession. After exhausting his direct appeal, Weatherwax filed a habeas corpus petition that raised an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel (IAC) claim. Weatherwax alleged that his trial counsel, Michael Joseph, had failed to inform the trial court that a juror was holding a newspaper that contained an article about the trial that distorted Weatherwax’s testimony and was damaging to Weatherwax. The government (plaintiff) argued that even if the juror had read the article, Joseph’s failure to object was part of Joseph’s reasonable trial strategy. Joseph testified during an evidentiary hearing that Weatherwax’s case created a racially charged atmosphere in the Virgin Islands because Weatherwax, a White person—or Continental—had shot St. Clair Hazel, an unarmed Black man, and witnesses provided conflicting accounts about whether Hazel presented any danger to Weatherwax. Joseph’s trial strategy was to select as many Continental jurors as possible because Joseph believed that Continentals would be more sympathetic to Weatherwax’s claims that he shot Hazel in self-defense. Although Joseph was aware that one of the three White jurors had a newspaper on the last day of trial, Joseph had never seen more White jurors on a jury in the Virgin Islands, and Joseph did not think Weatherwax would get a better jury if Joseph notified the district court and the court declared a mistrial. The district court granted relief on the IAC claim, emphasizing that Joseph had disregarded Weatherwax’s desire to file a mistrial motion. The government appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Stapleton, J.)
Dissent (Lewis, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 604,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 604,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.