GPL Treatment, Ltd. v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.
Oregon Supreme Court
323 Or. 116, 914 P.2d 682 (1996)
- Written by Matthew Celestin, JD
Facts
GPL Treatment, Ltd. (GPL) (plaintiff), a Canadian company that made and sold wooden shingles, sued Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (defendant) for breach of contract. Louisiana-Pacific moved to dismiss, asserting that it never entered a valid contract with GPL because GPL didn’t satisfy the statute of fraud’s writing requirement under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). The trial court denied Louisiana-Pacific’s motion but didn’t address whether the UCC or the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) governed the transaction. A jury ultimately found in GPL’s favor, and Louisiana-Pacific appealed. The appellate court held that GPL satisfied the UCC statute of frauds. Louisiana-Pacific appealed to the Oregon Supreme Court, which affirmed without addressing whether the UCC or CISG governed the transaction.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.