Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & Manufacturing

545 U.S. 308 (2005)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & Manufacturing

United States Supreme Court
545 U.S. 308 (2005)

Play video

Facts

In 1994, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) seized Michigan real property belonging to Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. (Grable) (plaintiff) to satisfy federal back taxes Grable owed to the IRS. After giving Grable the statutorily guaranteed notice of the upcoming sale via certified mail, the IRS sold the property to Darue Engineering and Manufacturing (Darue) (defendant). Five years after the sale, Grable filed a motion to quiet title in state court, alleging that he did not receive proper notice of the sale because he was not personally served in the manner required by 26 U.S.C. § 6335, but rather received notice via certified mail. Darue removed the action to federal court, arguing that the case presented a federal question because it required interpretation of a federal tax law. The district court found that the federal jurisdiction was appropriate, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari on the jurisdictional question.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Souter, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 826,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 826,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 991 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 826,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 991 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership