Graduate Employees Organization v. Illinois Educational Labor Relations Board
Illinois Appellate Court
733 N.E.2d 759, 315 Ill. App. 3d 278, 248 Ill. Dec. 84 (2000)
- Written by Mike Begovic, JD
Facts
Illinois state law guaranteed the right to join unions and collectively bargain for certain groups of public employees, including teachers. The law explicitly excluded certain groups from this right. One of these groups was students. A group of teacher’s assistants (TAs) at the University of Illinois attempted to form a union. The union that they joined, Graduate Employees Organization, IFT/AFT, AFL-CIO (the union) (plaintiffs), appealed an order of the Illinois Educational Labor Relations Board (the board) (defendant), which dismissed the union’s request for certification and recognition as the bargaining representative for the TAs. In its decision, the board made several findings of fact related to the TAs. Among the findings were that the TAs received a monthly stipend and that their tuition and fees were waived. With some exceptions, only enrolled students were eligible for TA positions. The positions differed with respect to the nature of the work and the number of hours worked. Some TAs performed work that was related to their field of study, and some did not. The board employed the significant-connection test in its analysis, ultimately finding that there was a significant connection between employment as a TA and the student status of the TAs. The board held that all TAs, graduate assistants, and research assistants were students within the meaning of state law and consequently precluded from organizing. The union appealed the ruling.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Theis, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.