From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...
Graffman v. Espel
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
1998 WL 55371 (1998)
Sture Graffman (plaintiff) authorized Miguel Espel (defendant) to act as his agent in selling Graffman’s valuable painting. Espel asked Michael Delecea (defendant) to assist with the sale, and Espel delivered the painting to Delecea’s custody. Graffman made no objection, knowing Delecea to be a reputable art dealer. Avanti Gallery (Avanti) (defendant) purchased the painting from Delecea and resold it to two good customers, John and Jane Doe (defendants). When none of the purchase money reached Graffman, he charged Espel, Delecea, Avanti, and the Does with conversion and sued them in federal court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Kram, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 602,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 602,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.