Graham v. Sheriff of Logan County

741 F.3d 1118 (2013)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Graham v. Sheriff of Logan County

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
741 F.3d 1118 (2013)

Facts

Stacey Graham (plaintiff) was a prisoner in an Oklahoma county jail. Graham had a history of sexual abuse and bipolar disorder. A jail guard, Rahmel Jefferies (defendant), began chatting regularly with Graham. These conversations became flirtatious and sexual. Graham once consensually flashed her breasts at Jefferies. At Graham’s request, Jefferies brought Graham a candy bar and a blanket. Graham was placed in solitary confinement for an unrelated disciplinary violation, and there she was watched by another guard, Alexander Mendez (defendant). Mendez contacted Graham over an intercom and began a conversation about sexual fantasies. Graham said she had a fantasy about being with two men. Mendez asked whom she wanted him to bring, and she responded Jefferies. Graham voluntarily let Mendez look at her fully naked. Later that night, Mendez and Jefferies went to Graham’s cell and began fondling her without protest. Jefferies then had sexual intercourse with Graham while she provided oral sex to Mendez. The two men then switched positions. As Mendez went to penetrate Graham, she tried to stand. Mendez pushed her back down, saying “Bend over, bitch” and “Shh.” A nearby prisoner then made noise, and the two men left. Two weeks later, Graham reported the incident. Graham said the encounter was consensual but that she was reporting it because she felt guilty. Jefferies and Mendez were terminated. Graham began experiencing anxiety and depression and described the incident as rape to a psychologist. Graham sued the county sheriff (defendant), Jefferies, and Mendez (collectively, the jail officers), claiming the encounter violated her Eighth Amendment rights. Graham admitted that her sexual contact with Jefferies was consensual and that she had voluntarily stripped for Mendez. However, Graham contended that she had not actually wanted to have sex with Mendez and that consensual sex still violated the Eighth Amendment. The district court granted summary judgment to the jail officers, ruling that consensual sexual contact between a guard and a prisoner does not violate the Eighth Amendment. Graham appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hartz, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership