Graham v. St. John's United Methodist Church

913 F. Supp. 2d 650 (2012)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Graham v. St. John’s United Methodist Church

United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
913 F. Supp. 2d 650 (2012)

  • Written by Arlyn Katen, JD

Facts

As a result of a serious beating, Richard Graham (plaintiff) suffered a permanent cognitive disability that rendered it difficult for him to articulate his thoughts, comprehend information, and challenge authority figures. Graham began working part-time as a custodian at St. John’s United Methodist Church (St. John’s) (defendant) in 2008. After the other part-time custodian left, Graham assumed all custodial duties and performed his work satisfactorily. Reverend Sheryl Palmer (defendant) expected Graham to work 35 to 40 hours per week but allowed him to put only 25 hours on his timesheets, and Palmer instructed Graham to perform her personal chores. Palmer called Graham “stupid” and “retard” and allowed other employees to do so. Palmer also yelled at Graham in front of other people to embarrass him. In 2011, two church members advocated for Graham by helping him file a complaint with the Illinois Department of Labor to investigate Palmer’s mistreatment and by informing Palmer and St. John’s that Graham was ill and scheduled for surgery. Palmer unilaterally scheduled Graham to return to work soon after his surgery and then terminated Graham because he was unable to return to work. Graham sued St. John’s and Palmer, alleging disability discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). St. John’s moved to dismiss Graham’s case, claiming that Graham failed to prove that he has a disability under the ADA’s definition of disability.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Reagan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership