Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Graham v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
187 F.2d 87 (1950)


Facts

Francisco Gal sought legal advice from attorney Graham (defendant). Gal, an immigrant seeking American citizenship, had been arrested and charged with disorderly conduct and had forfeited $25 as collateral. Gal was concerned that the arrest would impede or bar his citizenship process. Gal testified that Graham informed him that he was unsure what he could do for him, but that he would speak to the arresting policeman and that “you have to pay money for that, because the money is talk.” Gal also testified that Graham told him that he would charge Gal $200 for a fee and $2,000 to pay the policeman. After Gal paid $300 one day and $1,900 the following day, Graham spoke with the arresting officer, but no money was ever exchanged. Graham testified that the entire payment he received was intended to be a fee for legal services, that he never mentioned paying money to the officer, and that no portion of the funds was ever paid to the police or anyone else. Graham was convicted in two counts of grand larceny under § 2201 of Title 22 of the District of Columbia Code and he appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Washington, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 201,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.