Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
  • G
  • Granite Properties Limited Partnership v. Ma…Granite Properties Limited Partnership v. Manns
From our private database of 16,800+ case briefs...

Granite Properties Limited Partnership v. Manns

Supreme Court of Illinois
512 N.E.2d 1230 (Ill. 1987)

Granite Properties Limited Partnership v. Manns


Granite Properties Limited Partnership (Granite) (plaintiff) owned a large tract of property that included a shopping center, an apartment complex, and each building’s respective driveway. Granite sold to Larry and Ann Manns (defendants) a part of the tract that was in between the apartment building and the shopping center. The two driveways were each situated on the land conveyed to the Mannses, and the Mannses knew this when they bought the property. Both driveways were used by Granite for a number of years before it conveyed the land to the Mannses. The shopping center driveway (Driveway A) led to the back of the shopping center and was used for deliveries and trash removal. Granite testified that even though there was another small driveway that led to the back of the shopping center from another side of the property, use of Driveway A was necessary for the proper functioning of the shopping center because there was not enough room in the other driveway for large delivery trucks to turn around and exit. The other driveway in question, the apartment complex driveway (Driveway E), led to the parking lot of the apartment complex. Granite testified that there was no other feasible place to put the parking lot and that Driveway E was the only way residents could access the parking lot. After the Mannses bought the tract, they told Granite to stop using the driveways. Granite brought an action in the Madison County Circuit Court to enjoin the Mannses from interfering with Granite’s use of the driveways. The Madison County Circuit Court ruled against Granite with respect to Driveway A, but in favor of Granite with respect to Driveway E. The appellate court ruled in favor of Granite on both driveways. The Mannses appealed.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Ryan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 448,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 448,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 16,800 briefs, keyed to 224 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial