Gray v. Macklin
Ontario Superior Court of Justice
[2000] O.J. No. 4603 (Ont. S.C.J.) (Canada)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
When Edward Macklin (defendant) crashed his car, passenger fifteen-year-old Michelle Gray (plaintiff) suffered brain injuries that meant she would never be able to work. Before the accident, she earned good grades in a general high school program, and her family members had educations and a strong work ethic. The Grays sued to recover damages, including Michelle’s lost future earnings. A battle of experts ensued. The Grays’ expert suggested using average earnings for a man who completed three years of community college or obtained a college degree and worked until retirement at age 65. The Macklins’ expert proposed using average earnings for a woman who completed only high school and retired at 61, the average retirement age for women. Meanwhile, the disparity in the Canadian statistical tables showed women still earn approximately 40 percent less than men.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Shaughnessy, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.