Gray v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
875 F.3d 1102 (2017)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Veterans disabled during military service are entitled to disability benefits. Service-connection presumptions make it easier to prove that exposure to toxins during warfare caused disease or injury, which would be difficult or impossible otherwise. The Agent Orange Act created a presumption that Vietnam veterans who contract certain diseases were exposed to a toxic herbicide. The presumption applies for veterans who served on land or those who served on inland waterways like rivers, known as brown-water veterans. The act does not extend to those who served exclusively in open waters around Vietnam, known as blue-water veterans. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) publishes the Adjudication Procedures Manual to guide its employees on which veterans are entitled to the presumption. In 2016, the VA revised the manual to exclude those who served in bays, harbors, and ports from the presumption. The VA did not follow notice-and-comment procedures or publish the changes in the Federal Register or the Code of Federal Regulations. The manual bound only VA-claims processors, not the Board of Veterans’ Appeals. Veteran Robert Gray and Blue Water Navy Vietnam Veterans Association (plaintiffs) sued the VA secretary (defendant), asking the court to invalidate the revisions.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (O’Malley, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Dyk, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
