Great American Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Novotny
United States Supreme Court
442 U.S. 366, 99 S. Ct. 2345 (1979)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
John Novotny (plaintiff) was a director and loan officer with Great American Federal Savings & Loan Association (Great American). Novotny discovered that Great American’s board of directors had intentionally discriminated against female employees by denying female employees equal employment opportunities. After Novotny protested the discriminatory policy and spoke out in support of Great American’s female employees, he was fired. Novotny brought a Title VII employment-discrimination action against Great American and sought damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3), arguing that he had been injured as a result of Great American’s hostile conspiracy to discriminate against female employees. The district court granted Great American’s motion to dismiss, holding that, as a matter of law, the board of directors of a single corporation could not engage in a conspiracy. Novotny appealed. The Third Circuit reversed, holding that intracorporate conspiracies to engage in sex-based discrimination in violation of Title VII could be redressed using § 1985(3)’s remedial framework. Great American appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stewart, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 796,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.