Great American Insurance Company v. Riso, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
479 F.3d 158 (2007)
- Written by Noah Lewis, JD
Facts
Riso, Inc. (defendant), a distributor of digital duplicating machines, parts, and supplies, faced an antitrust lawsuit brought by school districts, Modesto City Schs. v. Riso Kagaku Corp. The suit accused Riso of things such as refusing to sell replacement parts to independent service providers and disparaging the products of competitors so that school districts would not purchase replacement parts from them. Riso had a commercial general liability policy with Great American Insurance Company (GAIC) (plaintiff) under which GAIC would defend Riso in personal-injury suits, which was defined to include slander, libel, or disparagement of goods, products, or services. GAIC refused to defend Riso against the school districts. After the antitrust case settled, Riso filed in Massachusetts state court seeking a declaratory judgment that GAIC had a duty to defend. GAIC removed the case to federal court, and cross-motions for summary judgment were filed on the question of whether GAIC had a duty to defend. The district court found in favor of GAIC on the basis that the policy covered only the tort of product disparagement, not antitrust suits. Riso appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Boudin, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.