Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Town of East Hampton
United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York
178 F.R.D. 39 (1998)
- Written by Denise McGimsey, JD
Facts
The Town of East Hampton (Town) (defendant) enacted a law (the Superstore Law) prohibiting retail stores larger than 25,000 square feet outside of the Central Business District (CBD). The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. (“A&P”) (plaintiff), which planned to develop a 33,878 square-foot store on a site outside the CBD, sued the Town in federal court, asserting that the Superstore Law: (1) was enacted beyond the Town’s authority, (2) violated 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and A&P’s rights to due process and equal protection under the New York and federal constitutions, and (3) constituted an illegal restraint of trade. The Town moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim. Group for the South Fork, Inc. (Group), an environmental organization dedicated to protecting the rural character of East Hampton and neighboring communities, sought to intervene as a defendant. Filings by the Group established that some of its members lived near A&P’s proposed store and that the Group was generally opposed to any major commercial development in the area, even if it complied with the Superstore Law. The court considered the Group’s motion.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wexler, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
