Greebel v. FTP Software, Inc.
United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
939 F. Supp. 57 (1996)
- Written by Mary Phelan D'Isa, JD
Facts
Lawrence Greebel (plaintiff) filed suit under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PSLRA) against FTP Software, Inc., and its various officers (FTP) (defendants). Greebel alleged that FTP made materially false and misleading statements that violated sections of federal securities laws. Greebel supplied a press release to Business Wire to satisfy the early-notice requirements under the PSLRA. The press release was picked up by the Bloomberg Business News Wire, the Wall Street Journal, Boston Globe, and Dow Jones Wire Service. Thereafter, Greebel, Brian Robinson, and Richard Crane (movants) motioned to be appointed lead plaintiffs and for Milberg, Weiss, Bershad, Hynes & Lerach (MWBH&L) to be appointed lead counsel. FTP objected and alleged (1) the movants failed to comply with the PSLRA certification requirement requiring them to file sworn certifications with their complaint that attest to their transactions in the security; (2) Greebel’s failure to satisfy the PSLRA’s publication requirements for early notice in a widely circulated national business-oriented publication or wire service; and (3) the trial court prematurely decided that the movants met the criteria set forth in the PSLRA for lead plaintiff. The movants contested FTP’s standing to challenge their motion.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Tauro, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.