Green Earth Wellness Center, LLC v. Atain Specialty Insurance Co.
United States District Court for the District of Colorado
163 F. Supp. 3d 821 (2016)
- Written by Patrick Speice, JD
Facts
Green Earth Wellness Center (Green Earth) (plaintiff) operated a facility for growing and selling medical marijuana in Colorado, which had enacted a medical-marijuana law allowing such activities. Green Earth insured the facility against damage by purchasing an insurance policy from Atain Specialty Insurance Company (Atain) (defendant). Atain knew Green Earth’s line of business, and the policy specifically excluded coverage for damage to contraband at the facility. After smoke from a nearby wildfire caused damage to some of the marijuana at Green Earth’s facility, Green Earth sought compensation for the damage by making a claim under the policy. Atain denied the claim, and Green Earth sued Atain for breach of contract, claiming that Atain’s denial of the claim breached the insurance policy. Before trial, Atain argued that denial of the claim was proper due to the contraband exclusion in the policy and that, even if that were not the case, the policy was unenforceable as against public policy. In particular, Atain claimed that the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA) prohibited possession and distribution of marijuana, even though Green Earth’s activities were legal under Colorado’s state medical-marijuana law, and the federal government had indicated an intention not to enforce the CSA when marijuana-related activities were lawful under state law.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Krieger, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.