Green Tree Financial Corporation—Alabama v. Randolph
United States Supreme Court
531 U.S. 79, 121 S.Ct. 513, 148 L.Ed.2d 373 (2000)
- Written by Tom Syverson, JD
Facts
Larketta Randolph (plaintiff) purchased a mobile home with financing from Green Tree Financial Corporation (Green Tree) (defendant). Randolph signed a financing contract with Green Tree, which included a fee for repossession insurance as a finance charge. The contract also required all disputes to be submitted to binding arbitration. Randolph brought a class-action lawsuit against Green Tree, alleging that the financing contract violated the Truth in Lending Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The district court granted Green Tree’s motion to compel arbitration, and Randolph appealed. The Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reversed, holding that the financing contract’s arbitration clause was unenforceable. Specifically, the appeals court focused on the fact that the contract did not apportion arbitration fees and that this threatened Randolph’s ability to vindicate statutory rights. Green Tree petitioned for a writ of certiorari in the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, C. J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.