Green v. Chicago Tribune Co.

675 N.E.2d 249 (1996)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Green v. Chicago Tribune Co.

Illinois Court of Appeals
675 N.E.2d 249 (1996)

Play video

Facts

Laura Green’s (plaintiff) son, Calvin, was transported to the hospital for a bullet wound. While he was undergoing emergency treatment, staffers from the Chicago Tribune Company (Chicago Tribune) (defendant) photographed Calvin without Green’s consent. After attempts to revive Calvin failed, medical personnel moved him to a private hospital room to await the coroner. Around that time, a Chicago Tribune reporter asked Green for a statement regarding her son’s death. Green declined. Simultaneously, Chicago Tribune staffers entered Calvin’s private room and took more photographs of him. When Green protested and demanded to enter the room, the staffers prevented her doing so. Once Green finally gained access to Calvin’s room, she spoke softly to her son. However, Chicago Tribune staffers overheard Green’s statements and published them, as well as the photographs of her deceased son in the newspaper. A subsequent article showing Green’s son undergoing emergency treatment did not feature Green in any manner. Green filed suit against the Chicago Tribune and its employees (defendants) for two counts of intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED). The trial court dismissed Green’s complaint. Green appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (O’Brien, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership