Green v. Missouri Pacific Railroad, Co.

523 F.2d 1290 (1975)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Green v. Missouri Pacific Railroad, Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
523 F.2d 1290 (1975)

Facts

The Missouri Pacific Railroad Company (the railroad) (defendant) had a policy of refusing to hire any applicant convicted of a crime other than minor traffic offenses. In September 1970, Buck Green (plaintiff), who was Black, applied for a job at the railroad office in St. Louis. The railroad rejected Green because he had been convicted of refusing military service in 1967. Between 1971 and 1973, 5.3 percent of Black applicants and 2.23 percent of White applicants were denied employment by the railroad because of convictions. In other words, Black applicants were rejected under the policy at a rate 2.5 times that of White applicants. Green sued the railroad pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 under a disparate-impact theory. The district court denied Green relief, and Green appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bright, J.)

Dissent (Gibson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership