Green v. Sun Harbor Homeowners’ Association, Inc.
Florida Supreme Court
730 So. 2d 1261 (1998)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
Allen Green (plaintiff) owned a townhome in a community governed by the Sun Harbor Homeowners’ Association, Inc. (Sun Harbor) (defendant). Sun Harbor sued Green for breaching Sun Harbor’s Declaration of Covenants (DOC). Sun Harbor’s complaint included a claim for attorney’s fees, stating that, under the DOC, the prevailing party in a breach action was entitled to recover reasonable attorney’s fees. Green moved to strike Sun Harbor’s complaint; Green’s motion-to-strike did not include a claim for attorney’s fees. Several months later, Green’s attorney wrote to Sun Harbor stating that Green planned to claim attorney’s fees unless Sun Harbor agreed to dismiss its action. Approximately five months after Green’s letter was sent, Green filed a motion-to-dismiss based on Sun Harbor’s failure to prosecute the action. Green’s motion-to-dismiss did not include a claim for attorney’s fees. Sun Harbor ultimately agreed to dismiss the action. Two weeks after entry of the dismissal, Green filed a motion for attorney’s fees, arguing that he was entitled to fees under the DOC as the prevailing party. The trial court denied Green’s motion, holding that Green was not entitled to fees because he failed to raise a claim for attorney’s fees in his motion-to-dismiss. On appeal, the appellate court affirmed, holding that (1) Green waived his right to attorney’s fees by failing to raise the issue until after the dismissal was entered; and (2) Green’s pre-dismissal letter to Sun Harbor about attorney’s fees was insufficient to raise the issue because it was not a record filing. Green appealed to the Florida Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wells, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.