Greenawalt v. Indiana Department of Corrections
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
397 F.3d 587 (2005)
- Written by Sara Rhee, JD
Facts
Kristin Greenawalt (plaintiff) was hired as a research analyst by the Indiana Department of Corrections (the Department) (defendant). After two years, the Department required Greenawalt to take a psychological test in order to retain her job. Greenawalt took the two-hour test, which examined Greenawalt’s personality traits, psychological adjustments, and health-related issues. Greenawalt later sued the Department and two Department officials in their individual capacities pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that the psychological test was an unreasonable search in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Greenawalt sought damages and injunctive relief to require that the Department expunge the results of the psychological test from Greenawalt’s personnel file. The district court dismissed the suit, finding that the Department could not be sued under § 1983, because the Department was not a person. The district court also found that the individual defendants could not be sued, because the defendants were protected by the doctrine of official immunity. Greenawalt appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.