Greenawalt v. Indiana Department of Corrections
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
397 F.3d 587 (2005)
Kristin Greenawalt (plaintiff) was hired as a research analyst by the Indiana Department of Corrections (the Department) (defendant). After two years, the Department required Greenawalt to take a psychological test in order to retain her job. Greenawalt took the two-hour test, which examined Greenawalt’s personality traits, psychological adjustments, and health-related issues. Greenawalt later sued the Department and two Department officials in their individual capacities pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that the psychological test was an unreasonable search in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Greenawalt sought damages and injunctive relief to require that the Department expunge the results of the psychological test from Greenawalt’s personnel file. The district court dismissed the suit, finding that the Department could not be sued under § 1983, because the Department was not a person. The district court also found that the individual defendants could not be sued, because the defendants were protected by the doctrine of official immunity. Greenawalt appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.