Greenberg Traurig Hoffman Lipoff Rosen & Quentel v. Bolton

706 So. 2d 97 (1998)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
G
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Greenberg Traurig Hoffman Lipoff Rosen & Quentel v. Bolton

Florida District Court of Appeal
706 So. 2d 97 (1998)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

David Bolton (defendant) obtained a final judgment against Marie Buscemi. To execute the final judgment, Bolton needed to serve Buscemi with a notice-of-deposition. After several unsuccessful service attempts, Bolton discovered that Buscemi was represented by Greenberg Traurig Hoffman Lipoff Rosen & Quentel, P.A. (Greenberg Traurig) (plaintiff) for an unrelated pending litigation. Bolton served the notice-of-deposition on Greenberg Traurig along with a subpoena seeking information about Buscemi’s whereabouts and assets. The information Bolton sought regarding Buscemi’s assets was not privileged or confidential, but it was being held by Greenberg Traurig at the time Bolton issued the subpoena. Greenberg Traurig challenged, arguing that (1) it could not be forced to accept service of Bolton’s notice-of-deposition on Buscemi’s behalf because its retainer with Buscemi did not cover Bolton’s action; and (2) the subpoena should be quashed because it demanded personal and financial information protected by attorney-client privilege. The trial court quashed the subpoena but ordered Greenberg Traurig to accept service of the notice-of-deposition on Buscemi’s behalf. Bolton and Greenberg Traurig both appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Civil Procedure

Key Terms

Related Videos