United States Supreme Court
360 U.S. 474 (1959)
The National Security Act of 1947, 5 U.S.C. § 171 et. seq., (the Act) created the Department of Defense (DoD) and gave its officers the authority to control their departments. Though the Act did not explicitly authorize the creation of a clearance program, the DoD implemented one, which was used to evaluate fitness for security clearance through hearings and fact determinations. Greene (plaintiff) was an aeronautical engineer employed by a private manufacturer that produced goods for the armed services. The nature of Greene’s job required security clearance. After proceedings that did not afford him the rights to confrontation and cross-examination, Greene was discharged from his employment solely based on a determination by the DoD program that his clearance should be revoked. Greene argued that the actions taken by the DoD were not authorized by Congress or the president and violated Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause. The federal government (the Government) (defendant) contended that authorization from Congress could be inferred from a number of other contract and criminal statutes that showed Congress’s recognition of the importance of keeping military secrets secure. The Government also argued that congressional authorization was implied from the continued appropriation of funds by Congress to different aspects of the DoD’s clearance program. The lower court ruled in the Government’s favor. Greene petitioned the United States Supreme Court for certiorari, which was granted.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Warren, C.J.)
Concurrence (Frankfurter, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.