Greenland Conservation Commission v. New Hampshire Wetlands Council

913 A.2d 776 (2006)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Greenland Conservation Commission v. New Hampshire Wetlands Council

New Hampshire Supreme Court
913 A.2d 776 (2006)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

Endicott General Partnership (Endicott) received planning permission to construct a subdivision on a plot of land that encompassed protected wetlands. Endicott applied to the Department of Environmental Services (DES) for a dredge-and-fill permit to build 13 roadway crossings over protected wetlands. The proposed construction would involve filling approximately 1.7 percent of the total wetlands on Endicott’s subdivision site. DES issued the permit to Endicott but required Endicott to comply with certain mitigation conditions, including the establishment of a conservation easement. Greenland Conservation Commission (GCC) (plaintiff) challenged the issuance of the permit before the New Hampshire Wetlands Council (NHWC) (defendant), which affirmed. GCC appealed to the superior court, which also affirmed the permit’s issuance. GCC then appealed to the New Hampshire Supreme Court, arguing that (1) the scope of DES’s impact assessment should not have been limited to the proposed dredge-and-fill roadway crossing project in the wetlands; (2) DES should have considered the cumulative effects of the subdivision as a whole, including the impact related uplands construction projects could have on the wetlands; and (3) DES should have considered the impact of future, subsequent uses of the proposed roadway crossings.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Broderick, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership