Greenmoss Builders, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.
Vermont Supreme Court
461 A.2d 414 (1983)
- Written by Lauren Petersen, JD
Facts
Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. (defendant) provided credit reports to its subscribers. One of Dun & Bradstreet’s subscribers was a bank that was a creditor of Greenmoss Builders, Inc. (Greenmoss) (plaintiff). Greenmoss was in sound financial condition and had suffered no economic reversals. Nevertheless, when Greenmoss met with its bank to seek additional financing, the bank informed Greenmoss that Dun & Bradstreet’s most recent credit report indicated that Greenmoss had filed for bankruptcy. Greenmoss denied the bankruptcy, but the bank refused to consider extending credit to Greenmoss until Greenmoss could clear up the discrepancy. The bank ultimately terminated Greenmoss’s credit. Greenmoss sued Dun & Bradstreet for defamation. At trial, Greenmoss learned that the error had been the result of a mistake made by a 17-year-old high school student that Dun & Bradstreet employed to review Vermont’s bankruptcy filings. A jury awarded Greenmoss $50,000 in actual damages and $300,000 in punitive damages. Dun & Bradstreet moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The trial court denied this motion. However, the court determined that it had incorrectly instructed the jury regarding the proper standard of liability and ordered a new trial. The trial court certified certain five questions to the supreme court, including whether non-media defendants were afforded the same protections as media defendants in defamation suits brought by private individuals. The supreme court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hill, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.