Greenwood v. Lowe Chemical Co.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 14th District
428 S.W.2d 358 (1968)
- Written by Lauren Petersen, JD
Facts
Charles Greenwood worked for a construction company with a contract to do work on the premises of Lowe Chemical Co. (Lowe) (defendant). Lowe manufactured and recycled chemicals. Its facility had several “scrubbing pits,” open vats of hot water mixed with acid. These pits had no guard rails or covers. The scrubbing pits were adjacent to a device called the “scrubber.” A four-foot concrete walkway separated the scrubber from the two scrubbing pits that flanked it. Greenwood and other construction workers at Lowe were warned about the danger posed by scrubbing pits because of the corrosive chemicals they contained. Greenwood worked on Lowe’s premises for several months. One day Greenwood was asked to bring a 16-foot ladder to the scrubber. As Greenwood carried the ladder, he stepped backward from the walkway into one of the scrubbing pits, then lost his balance and fell entirely into the pit. He died from his burns. Greenwood’s wife, Rebecca Greenwood (plaintiff), sued Lowe for negligence. She argued that Lowe had a duty to protect its invitees, such as construction workers, from extremely hazardous conditions on Lowe’s premises, regardless of whether those dangers were obvious to the invitees. Lowe argued that it had no duty to protect its invitees against open and obvious dangers. Lowe moved for summary judgment. The trial court granted Lowe’s motion. Rebecca Greenwood appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Barron, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.