Greg Allen Construction Co. v. Estelle

798 N.E.2d 171 (2003)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Greg Allen Construction Co. v. Estelle

Indiana Supreme Court
798 N.E.2d 171 (2003)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Daniel and Sondra Estelle (the Estelles) (plaintiffs) contracted with Greg Allen Construction Co. (Allen Construction) (defendant) for renovations to the Estelles’ home. Greg Allen (defendant) was Allen Construction’s president, shareholder, and employee. Allen signed the contract; did the electrical, plumbing, and carpentry work; and supervised other work. The Estelles sued Allen Construction and Allen for breach of contract and negligence, claiming the renovation work was substandard. The Estelles alleged that Allen Construction breached its contract by failing to complete the work on schedule, using materials and doing work of poor quality, and failing to meet construction-code requirements and construction-industry standards. The Estelles sought damages for interest charges on their construction loan and the cost to repair and complete the work. The trial court found that Allen was not individually liable because he was acting as Allen Construction’s president and employee. Reversing, the Indiana Court of Appeals held Allen personally liable because he participated in and supervised the negligent work. Allen appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Shepard, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership