Gregory and Appel, Inc. v. Duck
Indiana Court of Appeals
459 N.E.2d 46 (1984)
- Written by Kheana Pollard, JD
Facts
Gregory and Appel (plaintiffs) entered into negotiations to purchase property from Donald Duck and his family (defendants). Duck sent Gregory and Appel a letter outlining the terms of a proposed agreement. Gregory and Appel then sent Duck a proposed contract titled “contract for purchase of real estate offer to purchase real estate.” Gregory and Appel sent Duck $10,000 in earnest money to purchase the property, but Duck did not agree to the terms of the sale that Gregory and Appel proposed and returned the money. The proposed contract was materially different from the original proposal made by Duck. Gregory and Appel then brought suit against Duck, seeking a declaratory judgment that a contract for sale existed between the parties. The trial court determined that no contract existed and ruled in favor of Duck. Gregory and Appel appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sullivan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.