Gregory v. Helvering
United States Supreme Court
293 U.S. 465 (1935)
- Written by Robert Taylor, JD
Facts
Ms. Gregory (plaintiff) owned all the stock of the United Mortgage Corporation (United) and was entitled to receive dividends from United. Among its assets, United owned 1,000 shares of the Monitor Securities Corporation (Monitor). To avoid the ordinary tax treatment of dividend payments received from United, Gregory facilitated a corporate reorganization of United. As a result of this reorganization, United transferred the Monitor shares to Gregory instead of making dividend payments. Gregory fully complied with the technical statutory requirements for a corporate reorganization. Because the transfer of a corporation’s stock to its shareholders during a reorganization constituted capital gain, Gregory treated United’s transfer of Monitor stock to her as capital gain on her federal tax return. The federal tax commissioner (commissioner) (defendant) determined a deficiency in Gregory’s taxes. Gregory petitioned the Board of Tax Appeals (Board) for review, and the Board ruled for Gregory. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed in favor of the commissioner. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sutherland, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.