Griffin v. Dugger

823 F.2d 1476 (1987)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Griffin v. Dugger

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
823 F.2d 1476 (1987)

Facts

Peners Griffin (plaintiff), a Black man, was a correctional officer at the Florida Department of Corrections (department) (defendant). Griffin filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), alleging that the department’s promotion and discipline practices discriminated against Blacks. Subsequently, Griffin filed a class-action suit in federal court, contending that the department violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII). The suit claimed that the examination the department used to assess applicants discriminated against Blacks. Thus, the class included Black applicants who had failed the examination. Griffin added Henry Dejerinett (plaintiff) as a named plaintiff. Dejerinett, a Black man, applied for a position at the department but did not take the examination. Later, Alvin Smith (plaintiff) intervened as a named plaintiff. Smith, a Black man, was denied employment at the department after failing the examination. Smith did not file a complaint with the EEOC. The district court issued an order certifying the class and permitted Griffin, Dejerinett, and Smith to serve as named plaintiffs. The department appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Tjoflat, J.)

Dissent (Hatchett, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership