Griffin v. Northridge
California Court of Appeal
153 P.2d 800 (1944)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
The Griffins (plaintiffs) built a house on an empty lot next door to the Northridges (defendants). After the Griffins moved in, the Northridges engaged in a series of harassing behavior, including intentionally killing the Griffins’ flowers, splattering paint on the Griffins’ walls and windows, yelling epithets at Mrs. Griffin, creating noise at all times of the day and night, placing their garbage cans directly underneath the Griffins’ dining room window, and erecting a temporary, unsightly wall along the property line, which blocked sun, light, ventilation, and view from the Griffins’ home. The Griffins sued for nuisance. The Griffins sold their home prior to trial, and the trial court awarded $1,000 in damages. The Northridges appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Moore, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.