Griffith v. Byers Construction Co. of Kansas, Inc.
Kansas Supreme Court
510 P.2d 198, 212 Kan. 65 (1973)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Griffith et al. (plaintiffs) bought new homes in a development developed by Byers Construction Co. of Kansas, Inc. (Byers) (defendant). Byers had sold the lots to the builders before they were eventually purchased by the plaintiffs. The development was on an abandoned oil field and as a result, the saline content of the soil was too high to grow anything. Byers knew of the oil field and knew or should have known that the soil was not suited for vegetation. However, Byers concealed this information from the plaintiffs. Due to the grading of the lots, the plaintiffs were unable to discover the defect in the soil. The plaintiffs brought suit for fraud. The trial court granted Byers summary judgment because there was no privity between Byers and the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fromme, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.