Griggs v. Duke Power Co.

401 U.S. 424 (1971)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Griggs v. Duke Power Co.

United States Supreme Court
401 U.S. 424 (1971)

SR
Griggs v. Duke Power Co.

Facts

Prior to the enactment of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (the Civil Rights Act), Duke Power Co. (Duke) (defendant) maintained a policy of open discrimination against Black employees. Black employees were categorically excluded from all but one of Duke’s departments: the labor department, in which the highest-paid employee earned less than the lowest-paid employee in any other department. In 1955, Duke began requiring a high-school degree for placement in any department other than labor and for transfer to any of the more desirable departments. Beginning on July 2, 1965, the date on which the Civil Rights Act went into effect, Duke added additional requirements. To be placed in any department other than labor or to be transferred to any inside department, Duke required passage of two aptitude tests in addition to the high-school-degree requirement. The tests purportedly measured general intelligence but had no relation to job-performance ability. A number of Black employees (plaintiffs) challenged the policy under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Both the district court and the court of appeals held that Duke’s policies reflected no discriminatory purpose and had been applied equally to Black and White employees. The court of appeals rejected the claim that because, in practice, the tests excluded a substantially disproportionate number of Black employees, it violated Title VII. The employees petitioned for review by the United States Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Burger, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership