Grimm v. Grimm
Connecticut Appellate Court
844 A.2d 855 (2004)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Mr. Grimm (defendant) and Mrs. Grimm (plaintiff) were married. Mrs. Grimm filed for no-fault divorce based on an irretrievable breakdown of the marriage. Mrs. Grimm had previously filed and withdrawn five other divorce actions. Mrs. Grimm testified that she had continually withdrawn the actions due to Mr. Grimm’s attempts to prolong and force Mrs. Grimm to spend significant amounts of money on the process. Mrs. Grimm testified that Mr. Grimm was distant, abusive, and dishonest during the course of their marriage. Mrs. Grimm also testified that Mr. Grimm had exposed himself in the presence of a child and committed larceny. Mr. Grimm responded that Mrs. Grimm’s pattern of filing and withdrawing divorce actions was indicative that the marriage had not truly suffered an irretrievable breakdown and that Mrs. Grimm actually still wanted to reconcile. Mr. Grimm also argued that the Connecticut divorce statute violated his freedom of religion, which does not allow divorce. The trial court found that the marriage had irretrievably broken down and granted Mrs. Grimm divorce. Mr. Grimm appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Schaller, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.