Grimson v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

934 F. Supp. 965 (1996)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Grimson v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
934 F. Supp. 965 (1996)

SH

Facts

Allan Stuart Grimson (plaintiff) was a citizen of Canada and a professional hockey player who played in the National Hockey League (NHL) as an enforcer for the Detroit Red Wings. In 1993, Grimson filed a visa petition with the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) as a worker of extraordinary ability. The INS denied Grimson’s petition because he failed to establish that he possessed extraordinary ability, and the Administrative Appeals Unit (AAU) affirmed the denial. Grimson then filed an action with the district court, which remanded the case to the INS with instructions to compare Grimson’s application to those of other professional hockey players of who had been granted a visa as workers of extraordinary ability. The INS again denied Grimson’s petition, and the AAU affirmed the denial. Grimson again filed an action in court, and the court again remanded the case to the INS with instructions that Grimson was to submit, and the INS was to consider, evidence comparing Grimson’s skill, salary, and other abilities with those of professional hockey players who played in the same position as Grimson. Grimson then offered evidence of his salary and contract with the Detroit Red Wings, a table from Hockey News showing player salaries, newspapers, and magazine articles about Grimson. Grimson also offered an affidavit from Darren Pang, a former renowned professional hockey player and recognized expert in the field, declaring that Grimson was the third highest rated and paid enforcer in the NHL, and was the fifth highest rated in 1993 when he filed his original application. The INS again denied Grimson’s petition, and the AAU affirmed the denial. Grimson again filed an action with the court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gettleman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership