Grimson v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
934 F. Supp. 965 (1996)

- Written by Sarah Holley, JD
Facts
Allan Stuart Grimson (plaintiff) was a citizen of Canada and a professional hockey player who played in the National Hockey League (NHL) as an enforcer for the Detroit Red Wings. In 1993, Grimson filed a visa petition with the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) as a worker of extraordinary ability. The INS denied Grimson’s petition because he failed to establish that he possessed extraordinary ability, and the Administrative Appeals Unit (AAU) affirmed the denial. Grimson then filed an action with the district court, which remanded the case to the INS with instructions to compare Grimson’s application to those of other professional hockey players of who had been granted a visa as workers of extraordinary ability. The INS again denied Grimson’s petition, and the AAU affirmed the denial. Grimson again filed an action in court, and the court again remanded the case to the INS with instructions that Grimson was to submit, and the INS was to consider, evidence comparing Grimson’s skill, salary, and other abilities with those of professional hockey players who played in the same position as Grimson. Grimson then offered evidence of his salary and contract with the Detroit Red Wings, a table from Hockey News showing player salaries, newspapers, and magazine articles about Grimson. Grimson also offered an affidavit from Darren Pang, a former renowned professional hockey player and recognized expert in the field, declaring that Grimson was the third highest rated and paid enforcer in the NHL, and was the fifth highest rated in 1993 when he filed his original application. The INS again denied Grimson’s petition, and the AAU affirmed the denial. Grimson again filed an action with the court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gettleman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.