Grogan v. Babson Brothers Co.
United States District Court for the Northern District of New York
101 F.R.D. 697 (1984)
Grogan purchased livestock milking equipment distributed by Surge Inc. of Babson Brothers Co. (Surge) and installed by Don Carrier Surge Inc. (Don Carrier). The equipment allegedly caused electrical current to come into contact with the animals. Grogan sued Surge and Don Carrier in a New York state court on account of the defective equipment. At the time, Grogan believed that Surge was the equipment’s manufacturer. Grogan later learned that the manufacturer was actually Babson Brothers Co. of Illinois (Babson) (defendant). Grogan therefore brought a separate suit against Babson, alleging negligence and breach of warranty among other things, in a New York state court. Babson removed the case to a federal district court on the basis of diversity. Grogan then moved to join Surge and Don Carrier as defendants in his suit against Babson. Because Surge and Don Carrier were not diverse from Grogan, joining them to the suit would destroy diversity and obligate the federal court to remand the matter to state court. Babson objected to Grogan’s motion for joinder, asserting that its sole motivation was to compel remand. The federal district court considered Grogan’s motion.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Munson, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.