Groner v. Golden Gate Gardens Apartments
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
250 F.3d 1039 (2001)

- Written by Darius Dehghan, JD
Facts
Howard Groner (plaintiff) suffered from schizophrenia and depression. Groner rented an apartment from Golden Gate Gardens Apartments (Golden Gate) (defendant). Diane Arter lived in the apartment located directly above Groner’s apartment. Arter filed numerous complaints with Golden Gate because Groner screamed and slammed doors at all hours of the day and night. Eventually, Golden Gate provided Groner with a notice to vacate his apartment. Ray Gonzalez, Groner’s social worker, informed Golden Gate that he was providing counseling to Groner in an attempt to modify Groner’s behavior. Additionally, Groner requested two accommodations from Golden Gate. The first requested accommodation entailed Golden Gate allowing Groner to remain in his apartment for 12 months while he continued to receive counseling from Gonzalez. The second requested accommodation involved Golden Gate contacting Gonzalez immediately upon the receipt of any complaints about Groner. Golden Gate permitted Groner to remain in his apartment for a few months while he continued to receive counseling from Gonzalez. But during this period, Arter continued to complain about Groner’s screaming and slamming of doors. Moreover, Golden Gate contacted Gonzalez several times about Groner’s disruptive behavior. Yet Groner still screamed and slammed doors on a regular basis. Because the problem had not been resolved, Golden Gate provided Groner with another notice to vacate. Subsequently, Groner brought suit against Golden Gate, contending that it violated the Fair Housing Act (FHA). The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Golden Gate. Groner appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gilman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.